Some ALT text

Robert Pfaller: What to do when progress seems to melt away emancipation?


The current "postsecular" experience of blossoming religious fundamentalisms as well as of cultural fanatisms - such as veganism and "health religion" - challenges the modernist understanding of capitalism as a power that "melts" everything solid into thin air: apparently not everything is getting melted, and not forever - obviously some things can be recast again, or even newly cast. And on the other hand, precisely what used to be the melting forces, economic rationality, secularism and enlightenment, do not anymore seem to be indispensable weapons of capitalist development, but now appear to get melted themselves, due to its progress. This leads to the intriguing question: what is here melting what, and which of them is on the side of the egalitarian, emancipatory forces?

These paradoxes can only be explained by a closer analysis of the dynamics and overdeterminations in the history of religions. If we follow Jan Assmann's distinction between "primary" and "secondary" religions, as well as Octave Mannoni's psychoanalytic distinction between "belief" and "faith", and if we develop a precise understanding of Max Weber's notion of the "disenchantment of the world", we become able to draw better lines of demarcation. First, the enemy of superstitious belief is not reason, but religious faith. Disenchantment is therefore, as Weber emphasizes, executed not by enlightenment but by religion's hostility against magic. Secondly, religious fanatism occurs when the master-signifiers of belief, faith and secular reason get suspended. Religious fundamentalism and secular "health religious" fanatism therefore have to be understood as ideological twins; as opposite sides of the same coin. This suspension can be explained by a specific internal dialectic that occurs when faith, confronted with the beliefs of others, turns itself into paranoic consciousness. Thirdly, this paranoic consciousness, the obsession with the other's presumed enjoyment, is the indispensable ideological form of neoliberal capitalism. It keeps people narrow-minded, anxious, hostile against good life and envious against others - ready to accept childish, authoritarian prohibitions and, at the same time, to ignore the massive redistributions of wealth. From here, we can draw a first political conclusion: the ideological struggle of today's emancipatory forces is neither a struggle for, nor against religion. Rather, it has to follow George Bataille's hints concerning the "sacred of everyday life" as the stake of class struggle. The aim of emancipatory ideological struggle must therefore be to re-establish those master signifiers that allow individuals to behave in a sovereign way - or, in the words of Bertolt Brecht, "to fear bad life more than death


Robert Pfaller is professor of cultural theory at the University of Art and Industrial Design in Linz, Austria. Founding member of the Viennese psychoanalytic research group “stuzzicadenti”. Publications: The Pleasure Principle in Culture: Illusions without Owners (Verso, 2014) Umazano Sveto in Cisti Um. (Ljubljana: Analecta, 2009) Wofuer es sich zu leben lohnt. Elemente materialistischer Philosophie (Fischer, 2011) 2007 “The Missing Link” award for connecting psychoanalysis with other scientific disciplines, by Psychoanalytisches Seminar Zurich (PSZ). 2015 "Best Book Award" by the American Board and Academy of Psychoanalysis (ABAPsa).


Call for Participants

Mayday School 2016: “Religion and capitalism”

By the Institute for Labour Studies (ILS)

Time: April 27th – April 30th

Location: Stara mestna elektrarna - Elektro Ljubljana, Slomškova 18, Ljubljana

Call for Participants

In spring, an annual ILS international conference called the “Mayday...

Jean-Pierre Dupuy: Crisis and the Sacred

What is in question at the present moment is not financial capitalism; it is not capitalism per se; it is not the market, regulated or unregulated, self-regulated or self-deregulated, subject or not to short-selling. It is the place of the economy in our individual lives as in the workings of our so...

Religion and emancipatory politics (Selyem, Troha)

Chair: Lea Kuhar

The close connection between religion and politics has been emphasized many times throughout the history of political thought. We’re not talking here about some dark medieval times – one need only look at the French revolution to see how even revolutionary historical movements tha...

Religion as a philosophical battleground (Komel, Kaluža, Hergouth, Aumiller)

Chair: Jan Kostanjevec

The underlying premise of this panel is that philosophers have long understood that, as Marx once put it, »Religion is the general theory of this world […], its logic in popular form« and so that »religious suffering is […] the expression of real suffering and a protest agai...

Religion, patriarchy, misogyny (Jovanović, Sinanović)

Chair: Klara Otorepec

The most pressing contemporary conflicts regarding the social role of religion in Europe are doubtlessly those, related to Islamic minorities and their integration; unlike the right, the left is struggling to find the clear answers, wavering between unity on strictly secular...

Theology of capitalism (Khatib, Stimilli, Homburg)

Chair: Sašo Furlan

The relation between capitalism and religion is usually conceived by two seemingly divergent approaches. In the first case, a specific religion is regarded as a condition of the emergence of capitalism, such as in Max Weber’s “Protestant ethics thesis”. In the second case, most...