Programme outline: Labour and Technology

Objavljeno:

ILS Seminar: Labour and Technology October 6th 2017 Stara mestna elektrarna, Ljubljana

Among all the potential candidates for a global-systemic catastrophe, or at the very least a serious break with the current state of affairs, the one that elicits the greatest fascination is the one that is internal to the capitalist dynamic itself: the continuous revolutionizing of the economy as a consequence of the demand for a rationalizing implementation of new technologies. This demand must be followed by a contemporaneous articulation of left political projects, which are vitally dependent on a correct understanding of the current technical composition of labour power as it conditions the methods and aims of struggle alike. Considerable intellectual efforts in this area in the past decades notwithstanding, we may yet again repeat the diagnosis on the demise of the Fordist-Keynesian economic regime – which has, by way of mass concentration of workers, the clarity of their common interests against those of capital, and a high rate of employment, set the conditions for the historical pinnacle of worker’s power – as the start of a long crisis of the left. Beyond the abstract constatation that, varying appearances aside, the antagonism between labour and capital still persists, one should delve into the more concrete questions: in what manner precisely are labour and capital in mutual confrontation today, with all the changes of the past years and decades in effect. The capitalist labour process is in the middle of far-reaching changes, regarded by some commentators as nothing less than the fourth industrial revolution. Digitalization and the accompanying growth of information and communication networking have enabled transnational corporations to coordinate production globally and expand their control over the workforce. Some authors employ the term “digital taylorism”, describing the corporate methods of standardizing labour on a global scale through the use of ICT and the dequalification of once autonomous sections of labour. Thinking beyond, there are the unforeseeable changes brought about by a sudden development in artificial intelligence, rendering unclear the division between human labour and its possible machine substitutions. Here we confront the question that has followed the critique of capitalism since its very inception (since the well-known thesis on the falling rate of profit): Is the process of capitalist technological progress burdened with internal constraints? Is it possible to indefinitely supplant this new wave of reduction in the need for labour with the invention of new needs and new jobs? To be sure, capitalism has until now always succeeded in countering such reservations. However, with regards to the past several years of stabilization after the post-2008 crisis, one is forced to pose the question much more frequently – how much and what kind of employment will capitalism still be able to generate? To be able to clarify such considerations – are we “there yet”, or is it but a more ephemeral appearance, stemming from a local Western-peripheral point of view? – is crucial to the future of the left. It has become apparent that the sole dynamic of capitalism will not be able, in contrast to more optimistic visions (such as that of J.M. Keynes), to bring forth a clear and objective insight into the surplus of labour or a reduction in working hours. Likewise, we must pose the question, where would the scenario of a society of minor employment take us and what possibilities for left politics would it allow. For instance, is a new (Keynesian or Socialist) jumpstart of industry still a viable strategy? Should the left strive towards a techno-utopian liberation from labour or should it, conversely, devote itself to inventing and facilitating an alternative, non-capitalist societal recognition of human labour, one that would perhaps run against technological progress? Or is it precisely this increasingly unassailable complex of automation that offers possibilities for new forms of self-control and self-deliberation? Such dilemmas may seem distant now, but as they quite probably imply radically divergent fighting strategies, it would make sense to draw a conclusion as soon as possible. The seminar Labour and Technology, due October 2017, is one starting point to do so.

Sorodno:

Anej Korsika: Čilska pot v socializem

Henry Kissinger, ameriški zunanji minister v času Nixonove in Fordove administracije, naj bi na neki točki izjavil: “Ne vem, zakaj bi morali mirno gledati, da zgolj zaradi neodgovornosti njenega prebivalstva neka država postane komunistična.” Citat lepo povzema imperialistično bistvo politike, ki so...

Anže Dolinar: Primer Ukrajine

Odnos slovenske države do mednarodne centralizacije kapitala, ki se dogaja znotraj EU, je specifičen v tem, da ga spremlja razkrajanje moči slovenske države. Specifična situacija korespondira z mnogimi evropskimi deželami, ki so se znašle v polkolonialnem odnosu. To strukturno dejstvo onemogoča obst...

Dragan Nikčević: Distopija za današnji čas

Prispevek je bil prvotno objavljen v majsko-junijski številki revije Kinotečnik.

"Svet je propadel. Le še Britanija koraka naprej." Da je temu tako, skrbijo militariziran varnostni aparat, množična deportacijska taborišča in žrtvovanje svobode v imenu varnosti, znotraj družbe, v kateri je nasi...

Dragan Nikčević: The Origins of May Day

Have you ever noticed how so many protests happen in May? There is a reason for this, and it originates in the late nineteenth-century struggle for workers’ rights. The history of its commemoration is a microhistory of the Left.

In the beginning

In 1864, The International Workingmen’s Associatio...

Marko Kržan: Ocrt historije samoupravnog socijalizma

U ovom članku sažeto je predavanje kojeg sam imao 19. novembra 2012 godine u Beogradu na poziv drugarica i  drugova iz Centra za kulturnu dekontaminaciju (Učitelj neznalica i njegovi komiteti). Pokušao sam napraviti jednu skicu razvitka jugoslavenskog samoupravnog socijalizma između 1945 i kasnih se...

Pismo podpore Tovarni Rog

V Inštitutu za delavske študije izražamo podporo kolektivom, ki delujejo in so v preteklosti delovali v prostorih nekdanje tovarne Rog. Zgodba tovarne Rog, kjer sta nekoč stavkam, odpuščanjem in neštetim osebnim tragedijam sledili prisilna poravnava in stečaj, je simptomatičen in vzorčen primer proc...

Podprimo naše poštarje!

Mogoče se najde kdo med nami, ki bo v zimskem času, v snežnih razmerah in po zamrznjenih pločnikih, uporabljal kolo ali se vozil z motorjem.

Nihče pa ne bo pri zdravi pameti tega počel po 8, 10 ali 12 ur naenkrat, teden za tednom in pri tem tvegal poškodbe na ledu ali resno obolenje.

Razen tisti...

Theodor Adorno: Rana po imenu Heine

Danes mineva 160 let od smrti Heinricha Heineja, pesnika, kritika in publicista iz obdobja romantike, ki je bil med drugim še Heglov učenec in Marxov znanec.

Pred 60 leti, ob 100 obletnici njegove smrti, je Theodor Adorno napisal tekst "Rana po imenu Heine" (Die Wunde Heine, 1956), ki ga obj...

Rok Kogej: Alternative vstajniškega gibanja

Vstajniško gibanje je zelo heterogena tvorba in njenim posameznim delom so skupne le zgodovinske okoliščine, iz katerih so vzniknili in na katere se odzivajo, pa čeprav različni deli te okoliščine razumejo različno. To so okoliščine svetovne gospodarske in finančne krize, ki je v ZDA izbruhnila leta...

Sašo Slaček: »Niti bankir niti fašistka!«

V drugem krogu predsedniških volitev v Franciji je zmago slavil predstavnik establišmenta, nekdanji bankir, avtor pomembnih neoliberalnih reform vlade Manuela Vallsa, Emmanuel Macron. Čeprav bo marsikdo občutil olajšanje, da predsedniškega mesta ni uspelo zasesti kandidatki skrajne desnice Marine Le...

Tibor Rutar: Hegemonija in kolektivno delovanje

* To je razširjena različica članka, ki je bil objavljen v psihološki reviji Panika (let. 19, št. 1, 2015).

Italijanski marksist Antonio Gramsci je bil verjetno najvplivnejša izhodiščna referenca za praktično vsakega progresivnega avtorja, ki se je v drugi polovici preteklega stoletja ukvarjal s k...

Tibor Rutar: Max Weber

Uvod: »buržoazni Marx«?

Slavni sociolog in ekonomist Vilfredo Pareto je bil v osmrtnici socialističnega časnika Avanti! oklican za »buržoaznega Karla Marxa«.[1] Veliko bolj znano je, da je leta 1926 Albert Salomon s tem izrazom opisal še enega, nemara slavnejšega sociologa in ekonomista, Maxa...

Tibor Rutar: Roy Bhaskar

Na današnji dan leta 1944 se je rodil Roy Bhaskar, britanski filozof in utemeljitelj kritičnega realizma. Kritični realizem je filozofija znanosti in družbe, ki je danes poznana v mnogo različicah – med katerimi je nekaj precej nenavadnih in neproduktivnih –, vendar pa sta dve zgodnji Bhaskarjevi de...

Tibor Rutar: Transition, Austerity and Primitive Accumulation - Left Answers

Today, political, economic and, given the rise of Golden dawn and other fascist tendencies, also ideological implications of the global capitalist crisis are intensifying rather than, as the free-market ideologues would have us believe, decreasing. Hence, for the Left, a thorough understanding of ho...